Transvisions Go to Home

» Go to Home

Other Scenarios:
» Moving Alone
» Moving Together

» Moving Less
» Stop Moving


Scope

  • Environmental concern: CO2 has to be reduced as much as possible in the shortest time.
  • Changes in behaviour: policies aiming to modify users and firms’ mobility decisions are effective, complemented by restrictive policies whenever needed.

Similar scenarios

  • “The Hundred Flowers” (Forward Studies Unit)
  • “Regional Communities” (CPB)
  • “Take the Train” (EMCC)
  • “Sustainability First” (UN GEO-3)

Population dynamics

  • Decrease of total population.
  • Low level of immigration.
  • Very strong ageing.
  • Cities become more compact. Some detached self-sufficient communities.

Socio-economy and technology dynamics

  • Technology improvements are limited, focused on environmental and safety conditions, as well as on organisational aspects.
  • Productivity gains are limited.
  • Companies do more local business, following the consumer’s increasing environmental awareness.
  • Low relative growth of trade, due to the increasing protection of imports to encourage local production.
  • Tourism grows more locally.
  • Unemployment is marginal, since work is distributed across active population. Less working-hours per day.
  • Increase of ecological taxes, and reduction of income-based taxes.
  • GDP decreases, but global well-being may increase due to the internalisation of the environmental externalities of economic development.
  • GDP gap across European regions is slightly reduced.
  • The structure of regional economies becomes more balanced.

Transport, energy and other mobility-related policies

  • Efforts on environmental education to reduce unnecessary mobility.
  • Pricing and regulation to induce self-organisation in mobility demand.
  • Better maintenance and management of existing infrastructure, giving priority to public transport.
  • Moderate increase in local infrastructure, especially in clean public transport.
  • Strict land-use policies to avoid urban sprawl.
  • Large tax increases on fossil fuels and subsidies for renewable energy.
  • Technology development focused mostly on safety and environmental efficiency.

Mobility and energy

  • GDP elasticity of passenger transport decreases because of land-use policies and behavioural attitudes.
  • GDP elasticity of freight transport decreases because markets grow mostly locally.
  • Average trip length decreases, because the relative decline of long-distance trips increase in relation to short-distance.
  • Transport prices increase, especially in the short term on roads.
  • More use of renewable resources, even if not economically efficient, as well as electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles. No nuclear facilities are built. Oil is progressively less used, even before it reaches what would be its natural peak. Solar energy grows in the long-term. More decentralised production facilities and self-sufficient activities.
  • Congestion increase in the short term, due to the lack of road and airport infrastructure capacity increases, decreasing notably afterwards when behavioural changes occur.
  • Vehicle occupancy increases, since trips are optimised.
  • Emission factors improve because technology is oriented to achieve this goal.

Storyline

  • 2010-2020:     Behavioural policies have implementation problems. Diversification of energy sources. Emphasis on land-use and mobility regulation. CO2 emissions grow at a lower ratio. Decline in GDP.

  • 2020-2030:     Emphasis on pro-active policies to reinforce behavioural policies. Land-use policies start to be effective. Important reduction of CO2 emissions. Increasing importance of local markets. Increase in renewable technologies. GDP becomes stabilised.

  • 2030-2040:     Continuation and intensification of the previous trends. Emergence of new technologies bringing sustainable economic growth. Zero-carbon economy practically achieved.

  • 2040-2050:     Stable and sustainable growth is maintained.

 

 


This website is part of the Transvisions project, developed by Tetraplan (DK), Mcrit (SP), ISIS (IT) and Leeds University (UK) in 2008 - 2009 for the DGTREN European Comission. (EC DGTREN does not necessarilly agree on the full contain of this website)

Web development:
...